Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 30(3): 251-255, 2024 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484239

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: This study is important because it aimed to assess an intervention to decrease patient discomfort after a robotic sacral colpopexy. OBJECTIVE: Our primary outcome was to determine whether preoperative use of polyethylene glycol decreases time to first bowel movement postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include degree of pain with first bowel movement and stool consistency. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial. The experimental group was assigned polyethylene glycol daily for 7 days before surgery and the control group was not. All patients received polyethylene glycol postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant reduction in the time to first postoperative bowel movement when preoperative polyethylene glycol was used (mean [SD] in days for the control and experimental groups of 2.32 [0.99] and 1.96 [1.00], P = 0.21). There was a statistically significant reduction in pain levels with the first postoperative bowel movement in the experimental group (median [IQR] of 4 [2-5] vs 1 [0-2], P = 0.0007). Postoperative day 1 pain levels were also significantly lower in the experimental group (median [IQR] of 4 [3-6] vs 2 [0-4], P = 0.0484). In addition, patients had decreased average postoperative pain levels over 7 days with an estimated difference in the median pain levels of 1.88 units (95% confidence interval, 0.64-3.12; P = 0.0038). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative administration of polyethylene glycol did not decrease time to first postoperative bowel movement. Patients in the experimental group exhibited less pain with their first postoperative bowel movement and had improved pain levels on postoperative day 1.


Assuntos
Defecação , Polietilenoglicóis , Humanos , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória
2.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 29(2): 218-224, 2023 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36735437

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects millions of women globally. Still, medical students and obstetrics and gynecology residents gain minimal exposure to POP during training. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to increase exposure to POP by creating a high-fidelity, dynamic, 3-dimensional pelvic model of prolapse and using it to teach through didactic learning sessions. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study from November 2021 to July 2022. Presession and postsession surveys were administered to assess for change in POP knowledge both subjectively and objectively. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a P value of 0.05 denoting significance. RESULTS: Thirty-three learners participated in the study, including 18 residents and 15 medical students. Most participants had interacted with urogynecologists and had seen at least 1 patient with POP. Fewer participants had received prior education on POP and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examination, witnessed or performed a POP-Q examination, or participated in POP surgical procedures. After learning with the model, comfort with identifying POP doubled (P < 0.001), the ability to understand the POP-Q examination quadrupled (P < 0.001), the ability to perform a POP-Q examination tripled (P < 0.001), and the ability to teach a POP-Q examination doubled (P < 0.001). The median score on a multiple-choice knowledge assessment increased by 40% (P < 0.001). Learners felt that the pelvic model was an effective teaching tool that increased interest in the field of urogynecology. CONCLUSIONS: Using a high-fidelity, dynamic model in didactic sessions enhances education about POP and the POP-Q system and should be used to improve learner exposure and experience.


Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/diagnóstico , Escolaridade , Diafragma da Pelve , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Int Urogynecol J ; 33(11): 3231-3236, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35267061

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Approximately 5% of patients pursue reoperation after sacrocolpopexy (SCP). Reasons for re-operation include recurrence of prolapse, mesh erosion, bowel and bladder dysfunction, and pain. We aim to describe patient presentation, intraoperative findings, and subsequent robotic approach to management of SCP failures and complications. METHODS: This is a case series of patients who underwent abdominal re-exploration after SCP over 7 years at a single institution. Demographic data, previous prolapse surgery, presenting complaint, prolapse stage, operative notes, and outcomes were reviewed. Nineteen patients were identified by CPT codes; ten met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Seven of the ten patients presented with vaginal bulge, urinary frequency and urgency; four also had stress urinary incontinence. Two patients presented with vaginal bleeding and another with vaginal pain. Operative findings on reoperation for patients who had vaginal bulge included detachment from the vagina or cervix (n = 4, 57%) and the anterior longitudinal ligament (n = 3, 43%). Of these, two had their SCP mesh reattached, and five had SCP mesh removal and replacement. The patients with vaginal bleeding and pain underwent mesh excisions. All ten patients had uncomplicated postoperative courses with resolution of symptoms in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: Prolapse recurrence and complications after SCP have a significant impact on patient quality of life. Recurrent prolapse after SCP theoretically occurs because of mesh detachment from the cervix/vagina, the anterior longitudinal ligament, or disruption/stretching of the mesh. Our case series demonstrates that abdominal re-exploration is feasible and valuable in these rare cases.


Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Dor/etiologia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/etiologia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Hemorragia Uterina/etiologia , Vagina/cirurgia
4.
HSS J ; 14(3): 266-270, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30258331

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The speed and degree of functional recovery over time after surgery for tibial shaft fracture has been previously described using subjective methods. QUESTIONS/PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantitatively measure recovery of isokinetic strength in the injured leg after surgical repair of isolated closed tibial shaft fracture. METHODS: In this prospective case series, patients were recruited after intramedullary nailing for isolated closed tibial shaft fracture at an academic medical center from January 2012 to December 2015. Recovery of isokinetic strength was quantified using an isokinetic dynamometer. Eight measures of isokinetic strength at 3, 6, and 12 months' follow-up were used to compare strength in the injured leg to the healthy leg. RESULTS: In 36 patients recruited, there was a significant difference in strength between the healthy and injured legs at 3 months for seven of the eight metrics used, at 6 months for five of the eight metrics, and at 12 months for none of the eight metrics. Observing recovery of strength longitudinally, we saw significant improvement between 3 and 6 months for four of eight metrics and overall between 3 and 12 months for five of the eight metrics. All four metrics that showed a significant improvement between 3 and 6 months involved plantar flexion. No metrics showed significant improvement between 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients exhibited equal strength between their healthy and injured legs at 12 months after surgery. Improvement in strength occurred to a greater extent between 3 and 6 months after surgery than between 6 and 12 months. Plantar flexion appeared to improve more rapidly than dorsal extension.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...